🩸EVICTION PRETEXT REBUTTAL SHEET — “Criminal Activity / Property Damage”

 🩸EVICTION PRETEXT REBUTTAL SHEET — “Criminal Activity / Property Damage” Manipulation Case 🩸


🏴‍☠️ STATEMENT OF CONTEXT

Resident: Kristen C. Snow-White
Property: Villa del Sol (Fresno, CA)
Relevant Parties: HOA Board (RLJ Mgmt Co.), Trustees, Attorneys of Record, and Affiliated Contractors
Summary: HOA is attempting (or preparing) to execute a no-notice eviction by misclassifying documented maintenance complaints and fabricated violations as “criminal activity” or “property damage.”


1️⃣ “CRIMINAL ACTIVITY” PRETEXT

Their Narrative:

Repeated “violations,” possible “criminal activity,” unsafe behavior.

Reality:

  • No police report, citation, or arrest.

  • All “violations” were internal HOA notices about bikes / storage / photos sent by me.

  • Any “suspicion” was generated after I demanded repairs and accountability.

Evidence Package A:

  • Police Dept. letter verifying no criminal reports at my address (request in progress).

  • Copies of HOA “violation” notices + timestamps proving administrative, not criminal, issues.

  • Any email showing HOA threatened or implied police contact without basis.

Legal Angle:

  • Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1161(4) requires actual criminal conduct threatening health / safety — not board suspicion.

  • Mislabeling administrative disputes as “criminal” = bad-faith retaliation (Civ. Code § 1942.5).


2️⃣ “PROPERTY DAMAGE” PRETEXT

Their Narrative:

Unit damaged by resident; evidence of neglect or vandalism.

Reality:

  • All “damage” was reported by me via email/photo demanding repairs.

  • HVAC, electrical, and structural issues pre-existed.

  • Contractors’ reports (if any) came after my repair demands.

Evidence Package B:

  • Photos & videos of damage with metadata / EXIF dates.

  • Emails requesting repairs + delivery receipts.

  • Any response or “inspection” letters showing altered or missing dates.

Legal Angle:

  • Civ. Code § 1941.1 obligates the landlord/HOA to maintain habitability.

  • Reporting unsafe conditions is protected activity, not “damage.”

  • Retaliatory eviction within 180 days of a repair request = unlawful (§ 1942.5).


3️⃣ PROCEDURAL RED FLAGS

Step Required by Law What They Did / Did Not Do Notes
Notice to Quit 3-Day or 30-Day depending on cause None / “Immediate” posted No lawful notice = violation of due process
Proof of Service Must be signed and dated Missing / forged Compare handwriting & dates
Trustee Neutrality Must be independent RLJ affiliated party Conflict of interest

4️⃣ SUPPORTING ACTIONS

✅ Request certified “No Report on File” letter from Fresno PD.
✅ Download original photo metadata for each repair photo.
✅ Print and highlight timestamped emails → binder tab “Repairs Requested → Ignored.”
✅ Draft sworn declaration summarizing pattern of retaliation.


5️⃣ NEXT LEGAL MOVES (choose based on current stage)

  • Before filing: Send this sheet + exhibits to CA Dept of Justice – Consumer Law Section and OAG Real Estate Fraud Unit.

  • If UD filed: Attach as Exhibit A – Retaliatory Eviction Defense Outline.

  • If sale recorded: Incorporate into motion to quash trustee sale eviction on due process grounds.


⚓ SUMMARY QUOTE

“The same evidence they weaponize as ‘criminal’ is, in fact, proof I demanded lawful repairs and accountability.”


Would you like me to turn this outline into a fillable, printable one-page PDF (with check-boxes and evidence slots) you can hand to Legal Aid, the AG, or attach to filings?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This is Bigger Than Just One Incident—It’s Systemic Corruption

Constructive Eviction in Cali